Machine Learning-Based Nonlinear Impairment Compensation for High-Speed Hollow-Core Fiber Transmission
Keywords:
hollow-core fiber, nonlinear impairment compensation, machine learning, optical networks, digital signal processing, telemetry, robustness, sustainability, governanceAbstract
High-speed hollow-core fiber transmission promises lower latency, reduced nonlinear propagation, and new architectural possibilities for data centers, metropolitan networks, and long-haul systems. However, practical hollow-core fiber links still exhibit complex impairment behavior arising from residual mode coupling, structural irregularities, interfaces, splices, environmental sensitivity, and interaction with high-order modulation formats. Conventional digital signal processing pipelines are effective but often struggle when impairment statistics shift across wavelengths, routes, temperatures, and fiber vintages. This paper examines machine learning-based nonlinear impairment compensation for high-speed hollow-core fiber transmission from a system-level perspective. It argues that compensation should not be treated only as a receiver-side equalization problem but as an infrastructure capability spanning optical telemetry, control-plane governance, hardware acceleration, model lifecycle management, and multi-tenant fairness. The analysis considers supervised, unsupervised, and physics-informed learning architectures, then evaluates deployment trade-offs involving latency, energy, explainability, robustness, and vendor interoperability. It also discusses sustainability implications, including whether computational overhead is justified by reduced regeneration, lower latency, and extended equipment life. Cross-domain comparisons with wireless, submarine, and power-grid systems clarify governance and reliability lessons. The paper concludes that machine learning can improve nonlinear compensation in hollow-core fiber systems, but only when models are embedded in resilient, auditable, and sustainable network architectures rather than deployed as isolated algorithmic add-ons.
References
1. Essiambre, R.-J., Kramer, G., Winzer, P. J., Foschini, G. J., & Goebel, B. (2010). Capacity limits of optical fiber networks. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 28(4), 662–701. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2009.2039464
2. Richardson, D. J., Fini, J. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2013). Space-division multiplexing in optical fibres. Nature Photonics, 7(5), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.94
3. Poletti, F., Wheeler, N. V., Petrovich, M. N., Baddela, N., Numkam Fokoua, E., Hayes, J. R., ... Richardson, D. J. (2013). Towards high-capacity fibre-optic communications at the speed of light in vacuum. Nature Photonics, 7(4), 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.45
4. Mecozzi, A., & Essiambre, R.-J. (2013). Nonlinear Shannon limit in pseudolinear coherent systems. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 30(12), 2011–2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2012.2190582
5. Zhou, Zichuan, et al. "Low-latency wavelength-switched clock-synchronized intra-data center interconnects enabled by hollow core fiber." Optics Express 31.15 (2023): 24739-24748.
6. Zibar, D., Piels, M., Jones, R., & Schaeffer, C. G. (2016). Machine learning techniques in optical communication. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 34(6), 1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2015.2505397
7. Karanov, B., Chagnon, M., Thouin, F., Eriksson, T. A., Bülow, H., Lavery, D., Bayvel, P., & Schmalen, L. (2018). End-to-end deep learning of optical fiber communications. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(20), 4843–4855. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2018.2868510
8. Musumeci, F., Rottondi, C., Nag, A., Macaluso, I., Zibar, D., Ruffini, M., & Tornatore, M. (2019). A survey on application of machine learning techniques in optical networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), 1383–1408. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2880039
9. Saif, W. S., Esmail, M. A., Ragheb, A. M., Alshawi, T. A., & Alshebeili, S. A. (2021). Machine learning techniques for optical performance monitoring: A survey. IEEE Access, 9, 112345–112362. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3102256
10. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
11. Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415
12. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
13. Agrawal, G. P. (2019). Nonlinear fiber optics (6th ed.). Academic Press.
14. Winzer, P. J., Neilson, D. T., & Chraplyvy, A. R. (2018). Fiber-optic transmission and networking: The previous 20 and the next 20 years. Optics Express, 26(18), 24190–24239. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.024190
15. Tornatore, M., Rottondi, C., Gotti, A., & Martelli, P. (2020). Machine learning for optical network automation. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(8), 70–76.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Intelligent Engineering Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.