Multi-Scale Image Analysis of Aggregate Packing and Its Influence on Asphalt Mixture Fatigue Life
Keywords:
multi-scale image analysis; aggregate packing; asphalt mixture fatigue; pavement infrastructure; digital twins; data governance; sustainability; robustnessAbstract
Multi-scale image analysis has emerged as a critical bridge between the microscopic morphology of aggregates and the macroscopic fatigue performance of asphalt mixtures. This paper develops a system-level examination of how imaging architectures, computational pipelines, and governance arrangements shape the translation of aggregate packing descriptors into pavement fatigue predictions. The argument is that fatigue life is not simply a function of binder content or aggregate gradation; it is mediated by spatial arrangement, contact topology, void distribution, and the robustness of the analytical infrastructure used to observe these features. The paper reviews micro-scale, meso-scale, and macro-scale imaging modalities, including X-ray computed tomography, scanning electron microscopy, optical surface scanning, and field-based vision systems, and considers their integration into digital twins for pavement asset management. It then analyzes structural trade-offs among durability, permeability, workability, and sustainability, showing that aggregate packing optimization can improve fatigue resistance while creating new vulnerabilities in compaction, moisture susceptibility, and production variability. The discussion extends to data governance, fairness, policy, and deployment, emphasizing that multi-scale imaging systems are socio-technical infrastructures rather than neutral measurement tools. Issues of data ownership, algorithmic accountability, standardization, and geographic equity are examined alongside technical questions of resolution, calibration, and model transferability. The paper concludes that robust multi-scale imaging can support longer-lasting, lower-carbon pavements, but only if technical accuracy is matched by institutional capacity, transparent validation, and inclusive decision-making.
References
1. Masad, E., Muhunthan, B., Shashidhar, N., & Harman, T. (1999). Internal structure characterization of asphalt concrete using image analysis. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 13(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:2(88)
2. Ketcham, R. A., & Carlson, W. D. (2001). Acquisition, optimization and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: Applications to the geosciences. Computers & Geosciences, 27(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00116-3
3. Masad, E., & Button, J. W. (2000). Unified imaging approach for measuring aggregate angularity and texture. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 15(4), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00192
4. Kutay, M. E., Arambula, E., Gibson, N., & Youtcheff, J. (2007). Three-dimensional image processing methods to identify and characterise aggregates in compacted asphalt mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 8(4), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430601149769
5. Tashman, L., Masad, E., Peterson, B., & Saleh, H. (2002). Internal structure analysis of asphalt mixes to improve the simulation of Superpave gyratory compaction to field compaction. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 71, 1–29.
6. Arambula, E., Masad, E., & Martin, A. E. (2007). Influence of air void distribution on the moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixes. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(8), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:8(655)
7. You, Z., Adhikari, S., & Kutay, M. E. (2009). Dynamic modulus simulation of the asphalt concrete using the X-ray computed tomography images. Materials and Structures, 42(5), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9408-4
8. Coleri, E., Harvey, J. T., Yang, K., & Boone, J. M. (2012). Development of a micromechanical finite element model from computed tomography images for shear modulus simulation of asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 30, 783–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.056
9. Underwood, B. S., & Kim, Y. R. (2011). Viscoelastoplastic continuum damage model for asphalt concrete in tension. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 137(11), 732–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000282
10. L.W.Shi, Z.Y.Hu, H.M.Huang, et al. Effect of coarse aggregate morphology on asphalt mixture meso‑structure using image recognition technology, Measurement, 2026, 290: 122757.
11. Prowell, B. D., Zhang, J., & Brown, E. R. (2005). Aggregate properties and the performance of Superpave-designed hot mix asphalt (NCHRP Report 539). Transportation Research Board.
12. Lytton, R. L., Uzan, J., Fernando, E. G., Roque, R., Hiltunen, D., & Stoffels, S. M. (1993). Development and validation of performance prediction models and specifications for asphalt binders and paving mixes (SHRP-A-357). National Research Council.
13. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Long-term pavement performance program: The first twenty years. Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.17226/21937
14. Federal Highway Administration. (2017). Asphalt pavement sustainability strategies. U.S. Department of Transportation.
15. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2020). AASHTO T 283: Standard method of test for resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. AASHTO.
16. ASTM International. (2019). ASTM D8237: Standard test method for determining fatigue failure of asphalt-aggregate mixtures with the four-point beam fatigue test. ASTM International.
17. Transportation Research Board. (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures (NCHRP 1-37A). National Research Council.
18. Maeda, H., Sekimoto, Y., Seto, T., Kashiyama, T., & Omata, H. (2018). Road damage detection and classification using deep neural networks with smartphone images. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 33(12), 1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12387
19. Zhang, L., Yang, F., Zhang, Y. D., & Zhu, Y. J. (2016). Road crack detection using deep convolutional neural network. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) (pp. 3708–3712). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533052
20. Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Intelligent Engineering Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.