Scalable Multi-Agent Architectures for Financial Risk Analysis and Adaptive Investment Decision-Making

Authors

  • Katarzyna Hauffer Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Author
  • Celine R. Tiernan Department of Computer Science, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA. Author
  • Amedeo Burcardo Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. Author

Keywords:

multi-agent systems; financial risk; adaptive investment; scalable architectures; governance; robustness; fairness; socio-technical infrastructure

Abstract

Financial markets are increasingly characterized by interdependence, heterogeneous information, rapid technological change, and systemic risk that cannot be understood adequately through isolated forecasting models. This paper examines scalable multi-agent architectures for financial risk analysis and adaptive investment decision-making from a systems-oriented perspective. It argues that the central challenge is not merely the construction of more capable artificial intelligence agents, but the design of socio-technical infrastructures that coordinate specialized agents under conditions of uncertainty, latency, adversarial pressure, regulatory constraint, and contested accountability. The discussion synthesizes research on agent-based computational finance, multi-agent systems, reinforcement learning, large-scale representation learning, and financial stability policy. It considers architectural trade-offs among centralization, federation, hierarchy, and market-like coordination, and it evaluates how these choices affect robustness, fairness, sustainability, and governance. Particular attention is given to deployment realities such as data provenance, model drift, explainability, liquidity feedback, and operational resilience. The paper also explores adaptive investment decision-making as a problem of constrained learning in non-stationary environments, where agents must balance exploration, risk exposure, and collective stability. It concludes that scalable multi-agent finance requires layered governance, heterogeneous oversight, and infrastructure designed for graceful degradation rather than optimal performance alone. Such architectures should be evaluated not only by predictive accuracy or portfolio returns, but also by their capacity to preserve market integrity, distribute risk transparently, and remain accountable to public policy objectives.

References

1. LeBaron, B. (2006). Agent-based computational finance. Handbook of Computational Economics, 2, 1187–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0021(05)02024-1

2. Bonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(Suppl. 3), 7280–7287. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082080899

3. Wooldridge, M. (2009). An introduction to multiagent systems (2nd ed.). Wiley.

4. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

5. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

6. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., Petersen, S., Beattie, C., Sadik, A., Antonoglou, I., King, H., Kumaran, D., Wierstra, D., Legg, S., & Hassabis, D. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236

7. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., & Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961

8. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008.

9. Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., ... Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901.

10. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.

11. Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1

12. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

13. Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x

14. Bank for International Settlements. (2020). Central banks and payments in the digital era. BIS Annual Economic Report 2020. Bank for International Settlements.

15. Financial Stability Board. (2017). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services: Market developments and financial stability implications. Financial Stability Board.

16. Jiang, Hao, et al. "AgentOmnia: Scaling Agentic Models for Full-Scenario Applications." arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.23124 (2026).

17. Hommes, C. H. (2006). Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. Handbook of Computational Economics, 2, 1109–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0021(05)02023-X

18. Kirman, A. (2011). Complex economics: Individual and collective rationality. Routledge.

19. Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01232.x

20. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-24