Knowledge-Driven Workflow Optimization for Integrating Industrial Robotics into Conventional Construction Management

Authors

  • Brigid Hegarty Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. Author
  • Ferdinando Lollobrigida Department of Computer Science, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA. Author

Keywords:

construction robotics; workflow optimization; knowledge representation; robust scheduling; construction management; human-robot handoff

Abstract

Industrial robots are increasingly capable of executing construction tasks that were previously organized around human crews, yet conventional construction management systems represent work at a granularity that is too coarse for robotic execution. Work breakdown structures, critical path schedules, and Last Planner routines coordinate trades and buffers but do not encode robot reach, payload, tolerance, calibration, safety-zone, and handoff requirements. This paper develops a knowledge-driven workflow optimization framework that links construction-domain knowledge to executable robotic work packages and to robust scheduling decisions. The framework has three components. First, an ontology and knowledge graph represent tasks, work packages, robot capabilities, site states, constraints, and evidence, allowing capability matching and constraint generation to be traced to explicit knowledge rather than ad hoc rules. Second, a capability-aware eligibility model filters task-robot assignments, and a precedence model represents setup, calibration, and safety handoffs as first-class workflow dependencies. Third, a mixed-integer optimization model balances makespan, cost, risk, and schedule deviation under bounded duration uncertainty, with execution feedback updating capability estimates. The contribution is a formal integration logic for embedding industrial robotics into conventional construction management without replacing existing planning artifacts. The framework clarifies how robotic constraints alter workflow precedence, why semantic knowledge representation is necessary for reliable constraint generation, and how robust optimization can support managerial trade-offs. Its main implications concern task decomposition, handoff design, knowledge maintenance, and the boundary conditions under which robotic construction schedules remain both feasible and auditable.

References

1. Bock, T. (2007). Construction robotics. Autonomous Robots, 22(3), 201–209.

2. Bock, T., & Linner, T. (2016). Construction robots: Elementary technologies and single-task construction robots. Cambridge University Press.

3. Saidi, K. S., O'Brien, J. B., & Lytle, A. M. (2008). Robotics in construction. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Springer handbook of robotics (pp. 1079–1098). Springer.

4. Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers (3rd ed.). Wiley.

5. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2011). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors (2nd ed.). Wiley.

6. Ballard, G., & Howell, G. (2003). Lean project management. Building Research & Information, 31(2), 119–133.

7. Koskela, L. (1992). Application of the new production philosophy to construction (CIFE Technical Report No. 72). Stanford University.

8. Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.

9. Pinedo, M. L. (2016). Scheduling: Theory, algorithms, and systems (5th ed.). Springer.

10. Brucker, P., & Knust, S. (2012). Complex scheduling. Springer.

11. Bertsimas, D., & Sim, M. (2004). The price of robustness. Operations Research, 52(1), 35–53.

12. Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L., & Nemirovski, A. (2009). Robust optimization. Princeton University Press.

13. Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multicriteria optimization (2nd ed.). Springer.

14. Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology (Technical Report KSL-01-05). Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory.

15. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220.

16. Luo, D., & Yu, L. (2021). From factory to site—designing for industrial robots used in on-site construction. In Automating cities: design, construction, operation and future impact (pp. 87-109). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

17. Studer, R., Benjamins, V. R., & Fensel, D. (1998). Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 25(1–2), 161–197.

18. Pan, J. Z., Vetere, G., Gomez-Perez, J. M., & Wu, H. (Eds.). (2017). Exploiting linked data and knowledge graphs in large organisations. Springer.

19. Hogan, A., Blomqvist, E., Cochez, M., d'Amato, C., de Melo, G., Gutierrez, C., Kirrane, S., Labra Gayo, J. E., Navigli, R., Neumaier, S., Ngomo, A.-C. N., Polleres, A., Rashid, S. M., Rula, A., Schmelzeisen, L., Sequeda, J., Staab, S., & Zimmermann, A. (2021). Knowledge graphs. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4), 1–37.

20. Sacks, R., Koskela, L., Dave, B. A., & Owen, R. (2010). Interaction of Lean and building information modeling in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9), 968–980.

21. Bock, T., & Linner, T. (2015). Robot-oriented design: Design and management tools for the deployment of automation and robotics in construction. Cambridge University Press.

22. Fischer, M., & Kunz, J. (2013). Virtual design and construction: Themes, case studies and implementation suggestions (CIFE Working Paper No. 097). Stanford University.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-24